<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is IE6 dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.redcentaur.com/2009/is-ie6-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.redcentaur.com/2009/is-ie6-dead/</link>
	<description>Better design. Inspired</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:33:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Reffin</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.redcentaur.com/2009/is-ie6-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Reffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.redcentaur.com/?p=1#comment-2</guid>
		<description>After writing this article, I stumbled upon ForABeutifulWeb&#039;s article suggesting the use of a universal CSS file for IE6: one that works on any web page and can be reused with modification for logos and branding, etc. A great resource. You can find it at 
http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css/

Let me know your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After writing this article, I stumbled upon ForABeutifulWeb&#8217;s article suggesting the use of a universal CSS file for IE6: one that works on any web page and can be reused with modification for logos and branding, etc. A great resource. You can find it at<br />
<a href="http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css/" rel="nofollow">http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css/</a></p>
<p>Let me know your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.228 seconds -->
